-
Home Site Map Contact
FREE newsletter:
Search LDW®:  
 
 
 
ldyellowpages.org Find Your Country University Access LDCJ Login  Member Login
About Us  Ways to Support LDW®  JoinLDW® LD Job Search  Conferences LDW® Store
 
About Us
   Welcome
   LDW® Board 
   Professional Advisory Board
   International Advisory Board
    LDW® Brochure
    Our Sponsors
 
In Our Store

Contemporary Approaches to the Assessment of Children with Learning Disabilities

 LDW® Store Buy Now 
 
ldyellowpages.org
   Find Professionals      
   Find Products
   Find Schools
   Find Professional Resources
 
 

 

   
About LDCJ
See sample articles:

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view articles.
Editorial Board
Editorial Policy and Submission Guidelines
Benefits of Being Published in LDCJ:
  • Your article would be seen by over 24,000 subscribers
  • LDCJ is carried by EBSCO
  • LDCJ is a peer-reviewed journal
  • A PDF version of your article would automatically be emailed to you upon publication
  • Your article would be listed in a bibliography on our website
  • Your article could be chosen for inclusion in the University Access section of our website
  • Past Issues
    View the content pages from past issues of LDCJ
    If you want to receive the content pages for the next issue please provide us with your email:


       
    Home : Publications : Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal
    Contact Us Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal

    Table of Contents
    Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal
    September 2005 Volume 3, No. 2

    Decoding and Spelling Accommodations for Postsecondary Students Demonstrating Dyslexia -- It's More Than Processing Speed
    Noel Gregg, Cheri Hoy, Donna Ann Flaherty, Peggy Norris, Christopher Coleman, Mark Davis, and Michael Jordan
    The vast majority of students with learning disabilities at the postsecondary level demonstrate reading decoding, reading fluency, and writing deficits. Identification of valid and reliable psychometric measures for documenting decoding and spelling disabilities at the postsecondary level is critical for determining appropriate accommodations. The purpose of this study was threefold: (a) to examine the relationship between specific Woodcock-Johnson III Cognitive and Achievement clusters (WJ III; Woodcock, McGrew, and Mather, 2001) across populations with and without dyslexia at the postsecondary level; (b) to identify the strongest WJ III cognitive predictors for decoding, spelling, and reading fluency across college students with and without dyslexia; and (c) to discuss the implications of the findings for assessment and accommodation practices for secondary and postsecondary students. A total of 101 college students with documented dyslexia and 100 college students without disabilities participated in the study. Both word knowledge and processing speed were found to significantly influence performance in very different ways.

    Diagnostic Validity of Wechsler Substest Scatter
    Marley W. Watkins
    Cognitive subtest scatter has often been considered to be diagnostically significant. The current study tested the diagnostic validity of four separate operationalizations of WISC-III subtest scatter: (a) range of verbal, performance, and full-scale subtests; (b) variance of verbal, performance, and full-scale subtests; (c) number of subtests deviating by ±3 points from verbal, performance, and full-scale average; and (d) Mahalanobis distance of full-scale subtests. The WISC-III normative sample was compared to 1,592 students with learning disabilities (LD). Scatter indices were strongly correlated with each other (i.e., r = .81 to .95). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed that using any of the subtest scatter indices to diagnose LD resulted in correct decisions only 50% to 55% of the time. Chance would afford similar levels of accuracy.

    Applying Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions in Greek Mainstream School Settings: The Case of Learning Difficulties
    Maria Zafiropoulou and Chryssoula Karmba-Schina
    This study presents a psycho-educational intervention using cognitivebehavioral techniques to modify and improve thinking strategies as well as facilitate behavioral adjustment and generalization of strategy use in children with learning disabilities attending mainstream schools. One hundred and twenty Greek pupils in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th grade were treated under four different conditions: psycho-educational intervention, selfinstruction training, attention control, and no treatment. Results indicated that the psycho-educational intervention program was clearly superior to the other conditions, producing meaningful and lasting effects on participants' cognitive skills and strategies and a significantly heightened sense of academic self-esteem. Improved task performance was also evident in a 7-month follow-up assessment. Children's academic achievement (writing, reading and mathematics performance as rated by their teachers) also improved satisfactorily compared to that of controls.

    Using CRA to Teach Algebra to Students with Math Difficulties in Inclusive Settings
    Bradley S. Witzel
    The importance of algebra instruction has increased in the United States in the past few years. Thus, in most states, middle school students are required to take Algebra 1.Middle school students with math difficulties in inclusion algebra settings may require a different instructional approach. The purpose of this research was to compare student achievement in solving linear algebraic functions across two procedural approaches: a multisensory algebra model using a concrete-to-representational-to-abstract sequence of instruction (CRA) and a repeated abstract explicit instruction model. Out of 231 students who participated, the students who learned through the CRA model scored significantly higher on the post- and follow-up test. The success of the CRA model was consistent for students with a history of low, medium, and high math achievement. Implications of this model and possibilities for future research are discussed.

     
     
    Print This Page           Email This Page          Link to Us

    Top | Home | Contact Us | Join LDW® | Site Policies | Privacy Policy | Site Map

    © 2006 Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc.

    P.O. Box 142, Weston, MA 02493   Phone: (781) 890-5399   Fax: (781) 890-0555
     
    LDW® is a registered trademark of Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc.